The federal rule on interoperability and information blocking mandates that healthcare providers offer patients access to all the health information in their medical records “without delay” and without charge.
November 2023 – ”Disincentive Penalties for Information-Blocking Providers” proposed by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). This proposed rule was posted to the Federal Register and is taking comments until 11:59 p.m. ET on January 2, 2024.
The rule will affect physicians who participate in the Medicare program.
As of April 2021, “blocking” patients from their own health records is against the law and may result in fines for hospitals and clinicians. Learn how the Cures Act and information-blocking rule affect patients at WhereIsMyMedicalRecord.org.
The Cures Act final rule and information-blocking guidelines apply to:
For more details about each of these groups, review this document from the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC). If you or your job is listed in this document, the Cures rule applies to you.
In June 2023, the Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General (OIG) posted its final rule implementing information-blocking penalties. The final rule established statutory penalties created by the 21st Century Cures Act.
These penalties apply to electronic health record vendors (EHRs), health information exchanges, and health information networks (HINs).
If OIG determines that individuals or entities have blocked information, they may be subject to a penalty of up to one million dollars per violation.
Only certain entities are subject to an OIG information-blocking penalty:
All notes must be shared with patients. On October 6, 2022, the definition of electronic health information (EHI) in the 21st Century Cures Act expanded. It now encompasses not only the United States Core Data for Interoperability (USCDI) Version 1, but also all electronic protected health information (ePHI).
PHI encompasses any identifiable health information about a patient that is used, maintained, stored, or transmitted by a health care provider who bills an insurance company for services provided to any patient—also known as a covered entity. To be clear, patient access isn’t affected by whether the patient has insurance or not.
With this change to the interoperability and information blocking rule, EHI now extends to the designated record set (as defined by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act), which includes both medical and payment records. This means the rule now applies to any information that could be used to make decisions about individuals, including patients. For entities subject to information-blocking rules, all ePHI within a designated record set will be treated as EHI and subject to the rules.
EHI could include:
More information about EHI and ePHI can be found at HealthIT.gov.
Yes. There are complex situations in which information can be blocked—and these are called exceptions. Unless one of the exceptions applies, clinical notes must not be blocked.
For complete details, refer to the information-blocking FAQ on HealthIT.gov.
Summary of the Exceptions
The rule refers throughout to “actors.” They include:
We list below exceptions outlined by the final rule. These fall into two categories (source).
Category 1. Exceptions that involve not fulfilling requests to access, exchange, or use electronic health information (EHI):
Category 2. Exceptions that involve procedures for fulfilling requests to access, exchange, or use of EHI:
Details regarding conditions that must be met to fulfill these exceptions can be found on the ONC website.
There are a few types of clinical notes to which the rules do not apply. Examples include:
Under the Cures rule, in certain specified situations, you can block (or “hide”) information from patient access on online portals. These are known as exceptions. For instance, you can block information in the following scenarios:
Unless one of the exceptions applies, clinical notes must not be blocked. Details about exceptions are outlined at HealthIT.gov.
So far, studies suggest that some clinicians are changing the way they write notes in response to open notes implementations, while some are not. However, many clinicians experienced in sharing notes have reported positive changes in the way they write their notes, commenting that that the notes have become more valuable overall, especially to patients.
Few report “dumbing down” their language. Instead, they find themselves using fewer abbreviations in their notes and trying to avoid language that could appear judgmental to patients. Some report modulating their approach so that their notes become “teaching notes.”
In general, patients do not expect clinicians to write notes in layperson language, and in one large study, more than 90% report understanding their notes well. Studies suggest that most patients are not bothered by terms they don’t understand; they are happy to research them. They feel reading notes helps them prepare more focused questions for clinicians. Overall, studies show repeatedly that patients are enthusiastic about having a window into more information about their health.
Resources:
Your patient is now reading your note: opportunities, problems, and prospects | Am J Med (2016) |
The views and experiences of clinicians sharing medical record notes with patients | JAMA Netw Open (2020) |
How to write an open note for patients | 2020 |
Video: How to Write an Open Note webinar | 2021 |
The 21st Century Cures Act was signed into law by President Barack Obama in 2016 with overwhelmingly bipartisan support. Information sharing is central to the Cures Act. The Cures Act Final Rule—also known as the “information blocking rule,” which defines what and how information must be shared with patients—was released by the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) in 2022.
Some refer to this as the “information sharing rule.” It mandates that patients have rapid, free, and full access upon request to test results, medication lists, referral information, and clinical notes, all in electronic formats.
Some refer to the Cures Act final rule as the “Open Notes Rule.” This is inaccurate. While ONC strongly supports the concept of open notes and the efforts of the OpenNotes movement based at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, it's important to note that the Cures Act final rule and open notes are not synonymous. The final rule extends well beyond clinical notes.